I am what you would call a “professional student”; I have an Bachelors of Science in Computer Science, I am finishing a Masters of Science in Computer Science with a focus in Intelligent Systems, contemplating a PhD, and I have been a software engineer for 6 years now.

Recently, Joel Spolsky published yet another article about how he feels the universities of the world are churning out students incapable of doing the daily duties of software development. I’ve read other scathing articles about academia. I’ve even responded to many comments similar to “you have a degree but don’t know how to use ToolX or program in LanguageY.” These criticisms always irritate me (and strike me as originating from someone who begrudges those with degrees), so I want to set the record straight about academia. There are 2 simple points I want to get across:

1. The university’s primary concern is to teach you core knowledge and how to obtain new knowledge in any field.
2. Computer Science is a division of Applied Mathematics.

It’s that simple. At no point is it the university’s responsibility to teach students an arbitrary tool or language that the industry is consistant in its opinion. I read this really great response to his article that echos many of my complaints about this misconception.

Joel often comments that universities are trying to teach a particular language because it’s what the industry does or because MIT does it. That is wholly incorrect. The only reason why a university favors a particular language is so that the professors can focus on teaching towards and grading just one language, as that greatly simplifies their job. The choice of Java or Python is because you can express ideas simply and straight forward. The point isn’t to teach a language but to teach an idea expressed in a language.

If my undergraduate university had taught me specifically how to use CVS, that skill would essentially be wasted. Instead, they teach how versioning control systems work so that I may either implement one or just use one in my day to day job. Which sounds like a better idea in the long run?

Now keep in mind that CS is really just a division of Applied Mathematics. If you haven’t come to understand that, then you do not truly understand the field. In fact, the original “computers” were humans who computed mathematic equations.

Sure, most undergraduate assignments seem simple in comparison, but it’s because they don’t want to teach the peripheral tasks. Those tasks, such as testing, working in teams, and the latest “agile” techniques, are unrelated to the core understanding and vary widely within the industry. By understanding the core concepts, everything else is an extension of your existing knowledge.

If my university had taught me how to use FogBugz or how to write Perl TAP tests, I would have been looking for another university. My graduate school has yet to require I use a language or a tool and has yet teach a specific language and a tool. In the long run, that makes me a more adaptable developer and far more valuable to my employer.